Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList
Thread
'[EE] Pinning in newer relays'
2005\10\06@222752
by
laura capaldi
I was looking at some of the new Tyco/Schrack relays, the T7S series. Anyone know why they've moved one of the N/O pins up to in-between the coil pins. Won't this be dangerous if using mains currents between the N/O pins? Why change it from the original coil pins on one side and N/O pins on the other?
Laura
---------------------------------
Yahoo! for Good
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
2005\10\06@235049
by
Chen Xiao Fan
|
I do not know about T7S series but T7N is similar. As long as the
creepage distance and clearance fulfill the standards, it
is okay to be used. In T7N's case, the common contact pin is put
between the coil pins. This is quite unusual but it is still
okay (6mm from the center hole of the common pin to the coil pins,
normally 5.5mm is required for double insulation and 3mm for
basic insulation). It is also okay to be used for UL since
it is recognized by UL.
It can not be used in Protection Class II equipment though.
I am now using Schrack PE014 relay for Protection Class II.
It is one of the smallest which fulfill Protection Class
II (Overvoltage category III and reinforced insulation,
voltage rating 250V according to IEC60664). The isolation
voltage between relay coils and contacts need to be
greater than 3750V RMS in order to be used in Protection
Class II.
Maybe one big customer of T7N/T7S series requires Tyco/Scrack
to do this.
EN50178 and UL508/UL840 are good to read in terms of isolation
requirement. It is not so fun to read though.
Regards,
Xiaofan
-----Original Message-----
From: laura capaldi
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:28 AM
To: spam_OUTpiclistTakeThisOuT
mit.edu
Subject: [EE] Pinning in newer relays
I was looking at some of the new Tyco/Schrack relays, the T7S series.
Anyone know why they've moved one of the N/O pins up to in-between
the coil pins. Won't this be dangerous if using mains currents
between the N/O pins? Why change it from the original coil pins
on one side and N/O pins on the other?
Laura
2005\10\07@064202
by
Spehro Pefhany
|
At 07:27 PM 10/6/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>I was looking at some of the new Tyco/Schrack relays, the T7S series.
>Anyone know why they've moved one of the N/O pins up to in-between the
>coil pins. Won't this be dangerous if using mains currents between the N/O
>pins? Why change it from the original coil pins on one side and N/O pins
>on the other?
>
>Laura
I don't see the T7S in a quick search (it's always best to post a link to
a data sheet if you have it handy).
Assuming it's the same as the other T7 relays, this is an old and (IMHO)
electrically inferior construction. I don't like using it for mains relays.
Also the coil-to-contact breakdown is seldom as good as 4kV, and I've seen
relays with that construction as bad as 500V rating, which makes them
unsuitable for anything but toys. It does have a bit better electromagnetic
efficiency, so you can get lower power consumption for a given switching
current and life compared to other simple relays, but I really don't like
using this type for mains switching, even if it meets the minimum
requirements for UL.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
.....speffKILLspam
@spam@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
->> Inexpensive test equipment & parts http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZspeff
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2005
, 2006 only
- Today
- New search...