> > Hmmm, I see. I have long wondered why sophisticated alarm
> > systems are necessary for cars. Is it that simple measures like
> > "the club" don't work? I have always found the argument "if they
> > see the club, they will just move on to another car because it's
> > easier" pretty convincing. After all, isn't it true that the cars with
> > the highest rate of theft (thefts per 1000 cars) are relatively
> > cheap cars, so there aren't many crooks out there who are
> > willing to spend lots of time trying to steal an expensive car?
> >
> > Sean
>
> >From the demos I've seen by ex-thieves, the Club is a minor
> irritant. Breaking the Club itself isn't always necessary (and
> I believe they are fairly easily breakable), it's simply a matter
> of bending the steering wheel out from under it. As for alarms,
> even if it goes off (a) good luck if anyone comes to have a
> look or get involved (b) a competent thief will be away in
> seconds with either the car or the contents. A recent BBC
> program I saw had only one car out of 40, (I forget what it was,
> either a BMW or Volvo) that had good enough disablement
> and could not be driven away. All the other 39 were gone in
> less than a minute. Nothing stopped entry to a vehicle. And
> yes, it's always the poor working stiff's car that gets swiped.
> In NZ/UK it used to be Hunters, Escorts, Cortinas, Corollas
> and Civics. Affordable cars with a good resale black market.
> So perhaps toughen up to the fact that your motor may
> disappear, and concentrate on identifying who's got it
>
> --
>
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
> (like ads or off topics) for you. See
http://www.piclist.com/#topics