Searching \ for '[OT]: Printing artwork on envelopes -- USPS guidel' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: massmind.org/techref/index.htm?key=printing+artwork
Search entire site for: 'Printing artwork on envelopes -- USPS guidel'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[OT]: Printing artwork on envelopes -- USPS guidel'
2007\06\27@193018 by Vitaliy

flavicon
face
Hi List,

I would like to print some custom artwork on an envelope for a direct mail
piece, but I'm having a hard time finding the information on what the US
Postal Service guidelines are for things of this nature.

Section 102, "Elements on the Face of a Mailpiece" of the "Mailing Standards
of the United States Postal Service Domestic Mail Manual" has a diagram, and
some explanations:

http://pe.usps.com/text/dmm300/102.htm

However, it does not explain which areas of the envelope are OK to print on.

Any ideas?

Vitaliy

2007\06\28@161958 by Vitaliy

flavicon
face
Somebody? Anybody?.. <:-/

2007\06\28@200758 by M. Adam Davis

face picon face
I can't speak to what is allowed by their rules, but the worst stuff
I've seen has a full color print on the front with a white box for the
To: address, with stamps over the printing, and the from address in
low contrast over the printing.  In cases where the stamp is part of
the printing (presorted first class, etc) then it's within a white box
in the appropriate place.

The text in the white box should be machine readable, and you should
consider adding the USPS barcode to the address so they don't have to
print it on your envelope or sticker it on there.

According to the website you linked, it appears that what I've said is
pretty much it.  White space for a centered to: address, white space
for stamps and postal markings, and white space for return address if
you want the piece returned should it be deemed undeliverable.

You can print whatever you want elsewhere and everywhere.  Do other
postal systems have more strict requirements?

-Adam

On 6/28/07, Vitaliy <spam_OUTspamTakeThisOuTspammaksimov.org> wrote:
> Somebody? Anybody?.. <:-/
>
> -

2007\06\28@224729 by Vitaliy

flavicon
face
M. Adam Davis wrote:
>I can't speak to what is allowed by their rules, but the worst stuff
> I've seen has a full color print on the front with a white box for the
> To: address, with stamps over the printing, and the from address in
> low contrast over the printing.  In cases where the stamp is part of
> the printing (presorted first class, etc) then it's within a white box
> in the appropriate place.

I'm in the process of collecting junk mail.

{Quote hidden}

So you think the OCR area should be free of any artwork? It's pretty big,
actually -- since the USPS defines it in terms of margins, not absolute
size. It takes up close to 50% of useable space.

The way the USPS manual is worded, it sounds like their only concern is that
the address be located within the OCR area. It may be OK to place artwork
around the address box.

I'm thinking about creating a sample envelope, and mailing it to myself, to
see whether it will get rejected by USPS.

Vitaliy

2007\06\28@225833 by Roger, in Bangkok

face
flavicon
face
Why not create the envelop and then just go visit your local postmaster?
When I did this for bulk mailing (many decades ago), you had to attach your
envelope to the bulk mail permit application anyway.

Regards/Roger, in Bangkok

On 6/29/07, Vitaliy <.....spamKILLspamspam@spam@maksimov.org> wrote:
>
> ...

I'm in the process of collecting junk mail.
{Quote hidden}

2007\06\29@022509 by Ray Warren
flavicon
face
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 07:46:36PM -0700, Vitaliy wrote:
You should have the address and a border around the address ,1/4" or
more free of artwork,the address can be anywhere in the address block
area.Unless you have a complete 11 digit bar code the USPS will spray a
barcode on the mailpiece,it should be in the bottom 1/2" and can extend
back approximately 6 1/2" from the stamp edge of the
mailpiece.Additionally an orange barcode will be sprayed on the back of
the mailpiece starting about 3 1/2" from the stamp edge.If these areas
have artwork/printing etc your mail should get delivered but it will not
work properlly in the automated sorters and will usually take longer to
be delivered.You should be able to get help from a customer service rep.
Ray Warren
`
{Quote hidden}

> --

2007\06\29@025347 by William Chops Westfield

face picon face

On Jun 27, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Vitaliy wrote:

> it does not explain which areas of the envelope are OK to print on.

I think you're pretty much at the mercy of your local postoffice,
but they seem to be (in general) pretty nice about things.
Check out some of THESE "postcards" that were successfully
sent through the mail...
http://www.instructables.com/tag/?q=postcard+fungus

BillW

2007\06\29@042727 by Alan B. Pearce

face picon face
>Check out some of THESE "postcards" that were successfully
>sent through the mail...
> http://www.instructables.com/tag/?q=postcard+fungus

Hey, you don't need wire and fabric to make a bendy postcard -the PO seems
to do that to them anyway - except for the junk mail ones that is ...

2007\06\29@062816 by M. Adam Davis

face picon face
On 6/28/07, Vitaliy <spamspamKILLspammaksimov.org> wrote:
> So you think the OCR area should be free of any artwork? It's pretty big,
> actually -- since the USPS defines it in terms of margins, not absolute
> size. It takes up close to 50% of useable space.

No, the address should appear in a white box somewhere inside the OCR
area - the remainder of the OCR area can have as much printing as you
like, but be aware that if you put line art, words, or other high
contrast small figures in the OCR area your letter may require
additional processing.

So if you only need a 3 inch by 2 inch box for the address at the
chosen font size where the address will completely fit inside that box
with a little bit of white space on all sides fo the address then
anything outside that box can be full color printing.

> The way the USPS manual is worded, it sounds like their only concern is that
> the address be located within the OCR area. It may be OK to place artwork
> around the address box.

That's correct as far as I understand.

> I'm thinking about creating a sample envelope, and mailing it to myself, to
> see whether it will get rejected by USPS.

It won't.  First class mail is almost always passed through as long as
the to: address is valid and either human or machine readable.  People
have sent all sorts of interesting things through the mail.

You will rarely, therefore, get penalized for first class full rate
mail.  If you use presorted first class, or bulk mail then the
requirements don't necessarily get harder, but they won't go to the
trouble of hand reading the to: address if the machine rejects it.

So as long as you have a small white box somewhere within the OCR area
that is computer printed, and there are no terribly distracting
elements elsewhere on the face, then you should have no problems.  You
will probably have no problems even if there are distracting elements
on the face as the OCR software is quite sophisticated.

-Adam

--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Moving in southeast Michigan? Buy my house: http://ubasics.com/house/

Interested in electronics? Check out the projects at http://ubasics.com

Building your own house? Check out http://ubasics.com/home/


'[OT]: Printing artwork on envelopes -- USPS guidel'
2007\07\02@173447 by Vitaliy
flavicon
face
M. Adam Davis wrote:
> So as long as you have a small white box somewhere within the OCR area
> that is computer printed, and there are no terribly distracting
> elements elsewhere on the face, then you should have no problems.  You
> will probably have no problems even if there are distracting elements
> on the face as the OCR software is quite sophisticated.

Thank you everyone for your feedback.

I will share my experience with direct mail hopefully in a couple of weeks.

Vitaliy

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2007 , 2008 only
- Today
- New search...