part 0 906 bytes content-type:text/plain; charset=us-ascii (decoded base64)
|^jaz)'-8^Omf
1999\12\07@113046
by
spamdogg
NASA finally got a response from the Mars Polar Landar.
"The cellular phone you are trying to reach is either not turned on or out of th
e home service area at this time, thank you"
roger wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 02:52:44 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >I think he's having us on.
>
> ya think?
> --
> http://www.every-era.com
>
> As further proof that there is intelligent life in the universe please note th
e unexplained failure of the current mission to Mars.
1999\12\07@115325
by
John A. Craft
<x-flowed>I wonder if anyone fed the dog??????
Damn WDT...
Jc.
At 11:23 AM 12/7/99 -0500, Scott wrote:
{Quote hidden}>NASA finally got a response from the Mars Polar Landar.
>
>"The cellular phone you are trying to reach is either not turned on or out
>of the home service area at this time, thank you"
>
>roger wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 02:52:44 -0700, you wrote:
> >
> > >I think he's having us on.
> >
> > ya think?
> > --
> >
http://www.every-era.com
> >
> > As further proof that there is intelligent life in the universe please
> note the unexplained failure of the current mission to Mars.
</x-flowed>
1999\12\07@212822
by
W. Sierke
These failed missions; it's all a ploy. They're raising the impetus for
"having to send a manned mission to find out why all these probes keep
failing!"
Believe it, or not. ;)
From: John A. Craft <spam_OUTcraftTakeThisOuT
NCS-SSC.COM>
> I wonder if anyone fed the dog??????
>
> Damn WDT...
>
> Jc.
>
> At 11:23 AM 12/7/99 -0500, Scott wrote:
> >NASA finally got a response from the Mars Polar Landar.
> >
> >"The cellular phone you are trying to reach is either not turned on or
out
{Quote hidden}> >of the home service area at this time, thank you"
> >
> >roger wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 02:52:44 -0700, you wrote:
> > >
> > > >I think he's having us on.
> > >
> > > ya think?
> > > --
> > >
http://www.every-era.com
> > >
> > > As further proof that there is intelligent life in the universe please
> > note the unexplained failure of the current mission to Mars.
1999\12\08@071428
by
D Lloyd
Perhaps the lander is female and has PMS?
When its "strop" (bad mood, for the non-English) is over, it will probably feel
like talking and maybe explain why it has been *inexplicably* pissed off for the
last few days ? ; )
Oops, sexist comment......backlash shields up : )
Dan
1999\12\08@083339
by
Jonathan Ferguson
hahahahahhahahahahahahahah......
----- Original Message -----
From: D Lloyd <.....dan.lloydKILLspam
@spam@GB.ABB.COM>
To: <PICLIST
KILLspamMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [OT] Mars Polar Lander]
> Perhaps the lander is female and has PMS?
>
> When its "strop" (bad mood, for the non-English) is over, it will probably
feel
> like talking and maybe explain why it has been *inexplicably* pissed off
for the
> last few days ? ; )
>
> Oops, sexist comment......backlash shields up : )
>
> Dan
>
1999\12\08@173949
by
John Mullan
OK. OK. Enough is enough. We can spend billions of dollars and send a
probe millions and millions of miles to the farthest of planets in our solar
system. We can't get a probe onto Martian soil. Well, one......
The residents of Mars just don't want us to invade their privacy. I'm sure
it's in their charter of rights like it is here!!! Imagine landing near a
popular Martian skinny-dipping hole to watch (er.. listen) to a bunch of
naked Martians!!
To me it's obvious. The get their ray guns and shoot these things when we
get too close. After all, it'll be decades yet before a man actually goes
there. If we just keep our probes confined to a little deserted area then
they'll leave them alone :)
Just some thoughts...... (hehehehehe)
John Mullan
{Original Message removed}
1999\12\08@174604
by
Severson, Rob
> Imagine
> landing near a
> popular Martian skinny-dipping hole to watch (er.. listen) to
> a bunch of
> naked Martians!!
Isn't the average temp on Mars something like a hundred below? What are
they dipping in, liquid oxygen?
1999\12\09@121338
by
David Duley
|
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999 17:37:55 -0500, you wrote:
>OK. OK. Enough is enough. We can spend billions of dollars and send a
>probe millions and millions of miles to the farthest of planets in our solar
>system. We can't get a probe onto Martian soil. Well, one......
>
>The residents of Mars just don't want us to invade their privacy. I'm sure
>it's in their charter of rights like it is here!!! Imagine landing near a
>popular Martian skinny-dipping hole to watch (er.. listen) to a bunch of
>naked Martians!!
>
>To me it's obvious. The get their ray guns and shoot these things when we
>get too close. After all, it'll be decades yet before a man actually goes
>there. If we just keep our probes confined to a little deserted area then
>they'll leave them alone :)
>
>Just some thoughts...... (hehehehehe)
>
>John Mullan
The probe should, while descending towards the surface, have a
kick-ass sound system bellowing "I'll be calling
youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"...
That'l fix em.
Best regards
Dave Duley
1999\12\09@122139
by
tbo_mis
part 0 299 bytes
Made to Penetrate Lithosphere
or
Machine Pulverized upon Landing
(I wonder if it had any crash-test dummies aboard.)
;-)
________________________________________________
Get your own "800" number - Free
Free voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 1999
, 2000 only
- Today
- New search...