Searching \ for 'Manhattan' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: massmind.org/techref/index.htm?key=manhattan
Search entire site for: 'Manhattan'.

No exact or substring matches. trying for part
PICList Thread
'[OT] ArtBots Take Manhattan (press release for li'
2003\06\06@201803 by Philip Galanter

flavicon
face
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact:
Douglas Irving Repetto
spam_OUTartbotsTakeThisOuTspamartbots.org


June 3, 2003

ArtBots: The Robot Talent Show - ArtBots Take Manhattan

New York City, NY - Now in its second year, ArtBots: The Robot Talent
Show will take place on July 12th and 13th from noon to 6:00pm at
Eyebeam Gallery in Manhattan's Chelsea art district. Featuring the
work of 23 artists and groups from six countries, the show is a
hybrid combining aspects of both a juried art exhibition and a
traditional talent show. Participants include robots that draw,
paint, sculpt, sing, dance, and play musical instruments, as well as
many with talents that are a bit harder to pin down; you might call
them robotic sculpture or even cybernetic performance artists!

In keeping with the "Robot Talent Show" theme, attendees will be
invited to vote for their favorite ArtBot.  Two awards will be
presented at the end of the show: The Audience Choice Award and The
Robot's Choice Award (the artists vote for their favorite ArtBots).
All ArtBots artists and curators will be present throughout the event.

In organizing the show ArtBots curators Douglas Repetto, Philip
Galanter, and Jenny Lee have drawn from a large and varied pool of
open call respondents and invitees. The resulting body of work
reflects the diversity of opinions, techniques, strategies, and goals
found in the world of robotic art. And while much of the work is
playful and lighthearted, robotic art gives its human fans plenty to
think about.

"The application of robotics to the arts raises interesting questions
about things like authorship, responsibility, intentionality, and
even consciousness," notes Repetto, "and those questions have
relevance that extends well beyond the arts. When an artist makes a
robot that makes a painting, who's the painter? Who's responsible?
Does it matter? If it's good, who (or what) takes the credit? What
about when a robot makes a mistake, or breaks down? Who takes the
fall? The technology being used by many artists today is no different
from the technology being used to build robotic companions for the
elderly, automated security systems, or self-guided missiles. As is
often the case, artists are at the forefront of these technological
and social developments, asking, if not always answering, important
questions about the world we're creating."

 Philip Galanter notes, "As with last year's show we've tried to
create an event that appeals not only to academically inclined
connoisseurs of high technology art, but also families looking for a
fun, kid-friendly, afternoon out.  With 23 works the exhibition
pitches a range of ideas, some of which may be contradictory.  If
there is an overall trend, however, it is the digital shift of
emphasis from the virtual to the physical.  A sufficiently complex
base of technologies for robotics will yield physical systems that
reach out to us in ways that exhibit the surprise, variety,
fecundity, and decay of the natural world.  Eschewing technology art
as a virtual never-world requiring sense numbing LCD-goggles and
cyber-gloves to fool the body, these artists have chosen to explore
alternate realities, and alternate creatures, by creating them right
here in the physical world."

Jenny Lee remarks, "ArtBots is a showcase of human uses of
electronics, kinetics, sound, plants, and pixels to create art about
our complex relationship to technology and our changing concepts of
nature and self. Technology, by definition, is precise, quantifiable
and to a large extent, predictable. Technology in the hands of
artists often results in the unpredictable and quirky. The
intersection and overlap of human and machine are intriguing and
inspiring. The works in ArtBots are great examples of what is
possible when people think beyond the boundaries of standard,
technological applications and traditional approaches to art making.

Information on all ArtBots participants, including images, artist
statements, biographies, and links, is available now on the ArtBots
website: http://artbots.org


FACTS AT A GLANCE:

ArtBots: the Robot Talent Show

Cost: this is a FREE event
Date: Saturday and Sunday, July 12th and 13th, 2003
Time: Noon to 6:00 p.m.

Location:
Eyebeam Gallery
540 W 21st Street (between 10th and 11th Avenues)
New York, NY 10011

Nearest Subway: A/C/E/1/9 to 23rd Street

Additional information, including schedules, directions to the event,
and information about the participants is available at:
http://artbots.org


ArtBots Works and Participants:

50 drones: David Bowen (Minneapolis, MN)
Automated Architecture  Robot: Ira Spool, Anna Tsypin (Brooklyn, MA)
BabyBott: Stefan Prosky (New York, NY)
chair de poule: Brad Todd (Quebec, Canada)
Drawing Machine 3.1415926: Fernando Orellana (Columbus, OH)
Drums of War: Rahul Bhargava, Mira  Friedlander (McLean, VA)
Fotron2000(FOE-tron-too-THAU-zin(d)):  Daniel Paluska, Jessica Banks
jackbackrack (Cambridge, MA)
freqout: David Webber, Keith Waters, Berwick  Research Institute (Roxbury, MA)
Happy Feet: Stephen Turbek (Brooklyn, NY)
LEMUR: League of Electronic Musical Urban Robots (Brooklyn, NY)
Lev: Ranjit Bhatnagar (Brooklyn, NY)
MEART - "The semi living artist": SymbioticA  Research Group in
collaboration with The Steve Potter Lab (Western Australia/Atlanta,
GA)
micro.adam & micro.eva: julius  popp (Berlin, Germany)
Monkey On Your Back: Kal  Spelletich/SEEMEN (San Francisco, CA)
Neil: Jason Van Anden (Brooklyn, NY)
Phrase: Leesa and Nicole Abahuni (Farmingdale, NY)
Robots like H2O: Photosythesis Perpetual  Motion Machine:
Futurefarmers (San Francisco, CA)
Scratchrobot: Stijn Slabbinck (Ghent, Belguim)
Shootings (After Francisco de Goya): Han  Gene Paik (Brooklyn, NY)
Slowscan Soundwave: Douglas Irving  Repetto (New York, NY)
small work for robot and insects: host  productions (Liverpool, UK)
Tribblation: Josh Lifton, Michael  Broxton, Joseph Paradiso (Cambridge, MA)
The Watchers - Televisuality for Xenia:  John S. Lathram lll (Columbus, OH)


ArtBots Staff:

ArtBots Director: Douglas Irving Repetto
ArtBots Curators/Producers: Douglas Irving Repetto, Philip Galanter, Jenny Lee
Eyebeam Producers: Andrea Harner and Jonah Peretti
Executive Producer: The Columbia University Computer Music Center
Website Design: The Mysterious Liz and D.I.R.
ArtBots Theme Song: Christopher Bailey


ArtBots Sponsors:

Producing Organization: The Columbia University Computer Music Center
(http://music.columbia.edu/cmc)

Hosting Organization: Eyebeam (http://eyebeam.org)

Other Sponsors: Pratt Institute (http://pratt.edu)
The NYU Arts Technology Group (http://www.nyu.edu/its/atg/)


DO NOT PUBLISH THE FOLLOWING

High quality photos of the participating ArtBots are available upon request.

Please contact via e-mail where possible.

Interview and Photo Contact:
Douglas Irving Repetto (ArtBots Director)
.....artbotsKILLspamspam@spam@artbots.org
212-854-9267 (fax)

###

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

2003\06\06@204736 by Tom Messenger

flavicon
face
Question: what was the first artbot named?

Answer: PICasso

At 08:16 PM 6/6/03 -0400, you wrote:
>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>
>Contact:
>Douglas Irving Repetto
>artbotsspamKILLspamartbots.org
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads


'[EE] Manhattan style construction'
2008\04\08@154057 by James Newton
face picon face

I've added a little photo essay page to the site showing the very basics of
"Manhattan" style construction:

http://www.piclist.com/techref/pcb/manhattan.htm

I would love to get some feedback, updates, further expansion, or ideas.
Thanks to chuck adams, k7qo and Carel, na5n for permission to use their
photographs.

James Newton: PICList webmaster/Admin
.....jamesnewtonKILLspamspam.....piclist.com  1-619-652-0593 phone
http://www.piclist.com/member/JMN-EFP-786
PIC/PICList FAQ: http://www.piclist.com


2008\04\08@162943 by Byron Jeff

flavicon
face
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 03:40:28PM -0400, James Newton wrote:
>
> I've added a little photo essay page to the site showing the very basics of
> "Manhattan" style construction:
>
> www.piclist.com/techref/pcb/manhattan.htm
>
> I would love to get some feedback, updates, further expansion, or ideas.
> Thanks to chuck adams, k7qo and Carel, na5n for permission to use their
> photographs.

On quick typo I saw. Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.

Great page.

BAJ

2008\04\08@164455 by David VanHorn
picon face
> On quick typo I saw. Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.

I dunno.. I've had poi, that's "supper glue"  :)

2008\04\08@164701 by Bob Blick

face
flavicon
face

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:29:38 +0000, "Byron Jeff" <EraseMEbyronjeffspam_OUTspamTakeThisOuTclayton.edu>
said:

> On quick typo I saw. Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
>

Not if you make a meal out of it!

I really hate the way super glue smoke feels in the eyes - so I don't
use it on anything I will be soldering. Epoxy is bad enough. Especially
with the extra heat of lead-free, though that is still the distant
future for me when applied to prototyping.

Cheerful regards,

Bob

--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
                         unladen european swallow

2008\04\08@164806 by John Gardner

picon face
Bob Pease had some interesting breadboard techniques.

Wish I could find the links...

Jack

On 4/8/08, James Newton <jamesnewtonspamspam_OUTmassmind.org> wrote:
{Quote hidden}

> -

2008\04\08@170558 by David VanHorn

picon face
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:48 PM, John Gardner <KILLspamgoflo3KILLspamspamgmail.com> wrote:
> Bob Pease had some interesting breadboard techniques.
>
> Wish I could find the links...

Usually his stuff is all under http://www.national.com/rap

2008\04\08@171550 by John Gardner

picon face
> Usually his stuff is all under http://www.national.com/rap

thanks.

On 4/8/08, David VanHorn <RemoveMEmicrobrixTakeThisOuTspamgmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:48 PM, John Gardner <spamBeGonegoflo3spamBeGonespamgmail.com> wrote:
> > Bob Pease had some interesting breadboard techniques.
> >
> > Wish I could find the links...
>
> Usually his stuff is all under http://www.national.com/rap
> -

2008\04\08@172915 by Jinx

face picon face
> On quick typo I saw. Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.

No-on is above typos Byrone ;-)

> Great page.

Nice one

I can't help feeling that some techniques be reserved for something
really deserving, like 3D displays (and RF circuits seem to ring a
bell)

Google around for eg dead bug circuit

http://inklesspress.com/robot_art.htm



2008\04\08@175025 by Andre Abelian

flavicon
face
Very good idea to use gluing technique when need it but making whole
board I do not thing there is enough time for that. By the time we build it
it will be time to modify. Specially making pcb's are cheap now. Again
I like the gluing technique. Good job

Andre



{Original Message removed}

2008\04\08@180801 by James Newton

face picon face
I can't seem to find anything on Mr. Pease's site about it... Any idea what
keywords or URL's to look for?

--
James.

-----Original Message-----
From: TakeThisOuTpiclist-bouncesEraseMEspamspam_OUTmit.edu [RemoveMEpiclist-bouncesspamTakeThisOuTmit.edu] On Behalf Of
David VanHorn
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 14:05
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
Subject: Re: [EE] Manhattan style construction

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:48 PM, John Gardner <goflo3EraseMEspam.....gmail.com> wrote:
> Bob Pease had some interesting breadboard techniques.
>
> Wish I could find the links...

Usually his stuff is all under http://www.national.com/rap

2008\04\08@181615 by Bob Blick

face
flavicon
face
I thought it was Jim Williams from Linear Technology who dod all the
cool high speed prototyping with raw doublesided PC board.

Cheers,

Bob

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:07:36 -0700, "James Newton"
<EraseMEjamesnewtonspammassmind.org> said:
> I can't seem to find anything on Mr. Pease's site about it... Any idea
> what
> keywords or URL's to look for?
>
> --
> James.
>
> {Original Message removed}

2008\04\08@181657 by Peter Todd

flavicon
face
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 01:46:36PM -0700, Bob Blick wrote:
{Quote hidden}

Solder paste might work instead of super glue. Put a generous dab of
paste underneath and heat from the sides. The biggest problem would
likely be getting enough heat to the paste, but beats super glue fumes.

- --
peter[:-1]@petertodd.org http://petertodd.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH++2D3bMhDbI9xWQRApbFAJ9lMVuZyoU5YzQh/QaEHZRUf493ZwCdEeya
428SCi30eGRD3prV5WTnCys=
=br0s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2008\04\08@182142 by John Gardner

picon face
IIRC there were a number of "What's All This <Whatever> Stuff"
articles which discussed down & dirty prototyping. They redid
the site & I have'nt been able to find them - Some were quite a
while back, 90-ish maybe.

Basically dead-bug style w/ copper ground plane - Unlovely
but worked well enough, apparently.

On 4/8/08, James Newton <RemoveMEjamesnewtonspam_OUTspamKILLspammassmind.org> wrote:
> I can't seem to find anything on Mr. Pease's site about it... Any idea what
> keywords or URL's to look for?
>
> --
> James.
>
> {Original Message removed}

2008\04\08@182553 by David VanHorn

picon face
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:07 PM, James Newton <RemoveMEjamesnewtonTakeThisOuTspamspammassmind.org> wrote:
> I can't seem to find anything on Mr. Pease's site about it... Any idea what
> keywords or URL's to look for?

I didn't see anything there either, and it does seem to be an
aggressively undermaintained site.

2008\04\08@191551 by Harold Hallikainen

face
flavicon
face
Another spelling issue... I believe it should be "bus bars" instead of
"buss bars." See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buss .

On prototyping in general... I'm tending to go directly to prototype
circuit boards. They are pretty inexpensive (something like 3/$99 from
Advanced Circuits for 2 layer). I can then hack those up to fix my
mistakes. Most mistakes seem to be component values in analog circuits.
Hand wired prototypes seem to fall apart as I add one more wire to some
component. I spend more time debugging the wiring than the circuit. Also,
if this is something destined for production, at some point we're going to
need to do schematic capture and board layout anyway. May as well start
early.

My thoughts, anyway...

Harold



--
FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com - Advertising
opportunities available!

2008\04\08@192246 by Jack Smith

picon face
I have a web page at http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/Prototyping.htm
with Manhattan-style construction, as well a few other techniques I've
developed.

Jack



James Newton wrote:
{Quote hidden}

2008\04\08@194555 by John Gardner

picon face
> I thought it was Jim Williams from Linear Technology who dod all the
> cool high speed prototyping with raw doublesided PC board.

Yes, that's right! Very cool looking stuff. Maybe I can find that ...

thanks, Jack


On 4/8/08, Jack Smith <RemoveMEJack.SmithKILLspamspamcox.net> wrote:
{Quote hidden}

> -

2008\04\08@211927 by David VanHorn

picon face
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:45 PM, John Gardner <spamBeGonegoflo3STOPspamspamEraseMEgmail.com> wrote:
> > I thought it was Jim Williams from Linear Technology who dod all the
>  > cool high speed prototyping with raw doublesided PC board.
>
>  Yes, that's right! Very cool looking stuff. Maybe I can find that ...

I'd like to see his equation for ripple current vs lifetime (plus a
lot of other parameters) in electrolytics again.
I used it for a very unusual SMPS design, but I haven't been able to
locate it for a while.

2008\04\08@223330 by John Gardner

picon face
On 4/8/08, David VanHorn <KILLspammicrobrixspamBeGonespamgmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:45 PM, John Gardner <EraseMEgoflo3spamEraseMEgmail.com> wrote:
> > > I thought it was Jim Williams from Linear Technology who dod all the
> >  > cool high speed prototyping with raw doublesided PC board.
> >
> >  Yes, that's right! Very cool looking stuff. Maybe I can find that ...
>
> I'd like to see his equation for ripple current vs lifetime (plus a
> lot of other parameters) in electrolytics again.
> I used it for a very unusual SMPS design, but I haven't been able to
> locate it for a while.
> -

2008\04\08@224335 by Jinx

face picon face
> > Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.

> Not if you make a meal out of it!

It's what my mother calls 'gravy'........

2008\04\08@231244 by John Gardner

picon face
Damn hippies...

On 4/8/08, Jinx <@spam@joecolquitt@spam@spamspam_OUTclear.net.nz> wrote:
> > > Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
>
> > Not if you make a meal out of it!
>
> It's what my mother calls 'gravy'........
>
> -

2008\04\09@000512 by Jinx

face picon face
That's Mr Damn Hippy to you

> Damn hippies...
>
> On 4/8/08, Jinx <spamBeGonejoecolquittspamKILLspamclear.net.nz> wrote:
> > > > Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
> >
> > > Not if you make a meal out of it!
> >
> > It's what my mother calls 'gravy'........


2008\04\09@015308 by KPL

picon face
"cheap" has different meanings in different parts of the world and for
different people. I haven't made/bought any real pcb in years now.

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Andre Abelian
<.....aabelianspam_OUTspammason-electric.com> wrote:
{Quote hidden}

>  {Original Message removed}

2008\04\09@042537 by Jeff Stevens

flavicon
face

On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 13:46 -0700, Bob Blick wrote:

> I really hate the way super glue smoke feels in the eyes - so I don't
> use it on anything I will be soldering. Epoxy is bad enough. Especially
> with the extra heat of lead-free, though that is still the distant
> future for me when applied to prototyping.

Interesting.  I haven't noticed any superglue "smoke" building Manhattan
style.  I even use Sn96/Ag3/Cu1 at 750 degrees F.

-Jeff

2008\04\09@045736 by Apptech

face
flavicon
face
>> I really hate the way super glue smoke feels in the
>> eyes -

May well be a cyanide compound.

> Interesting.  I haven't noticed any superglue "smoke"
> building Manhattan
> style.  I even use Sn96/Ag3/Cu1 at 750 degrees F.



       Russell

2008\04\09@123402 by John Ferrell

face picon face
Hot melt glue (use shavings) works OK if you are fast...

John Ferrell    W8CCW

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing." -- Edmund Burke
http://DixieNC.US

{Original Message removed}


'[EE] Manhattan-style Prototyping'
2010\05\06@114422 by Marcel Birthelmer
picon face
Here's a neat article on Manhattan-style Prototyping I found
(certainly not by me): http://www.zianet.com/dhassall/advmanart.pdf

2010\05\06@120106 by Ariel Rocholl

picon face
Chuck Adams wrote these nice articles, here is the introduction:

http://www.qrpme.com/K7QO%20Manhattan%20Techniques%20Paper.pdf

...and your link is the 2nd part of it.

2010/5/6 Marcel Birthelmer <TakeThisOuTmarcelb.lists.....spamTakeThisOuTgmail.com>

> Here's a neat article on Manhattan-style Prototyping I found
> (certainly not by me): http://www.zianet.com/dhassall/advmanart.pdf
> -

2010\05\06@134746 by Michael Watterson

face picon face
Ariel Rocholl wrote:
> Chuck Adams wrote these nice articles, here is the introduction:
>
> http://www.qrpme.com/K7QO%20Manhattan%20Techniques%20Paper.pdf
>
> ...and your link is the 2nd part of it.
>
> 2010/5/6 Marcel Birthelmer <TakeThisOuTmarcelb.listsKILLspamspamspamgmail.com>
>
>  
http://www.qrpme.com/

This is a strange fixation, kits that fit in tuna tins or something?

What next? Sardine cans with  320x240 touch screen 18F4550?

2010\05\06@141559 by Neil Cherry

flavicon
face
On 05/06/2010 01:46 PM, Michael Watterson wrote:
> Ariel Rocholl wrote:
>> Chuck Adams wrote these nice articles, here is the introduction:
>>
>> www.qrpme.com/K7QO%20Manhattan%20Techniques%20Paper.pdf
>>
>> ...and your link is the 2nd part of it.
>>
>> 2010/5/6 Marcel Birthelmer <.....marcelb.listsspamRemoveMEgmail.com>
>>
>>  
> http://www.qrpme.com/
>
> This is a strange fixation, kits that fit in tuna tins or something?
>
> What next? Sardine cans with  320x240 touch screen 18F4550?

I want one but only if we can get the fish smell out of it. ;-)

--
Linux Home Automation         Neil Cherry       RemoveMEncherryspamspamBeGonelinuxha.com
http://www.linuxha.com/                         Main site
http://linuxha.blogspot.com/                    My HA Blog
Author of:            Linux Smart Homes For Dummies

2010\05\06@174825 by Michael Watterson

face picon face
Neil Cherry wrote:
> On 05/06/2010 01:46 PM, Michael Watterson wrote:
>  
>> Ariel Rocholl wrote:
>>    
>>> Chuck Adams wrote these nice articles, here is the introduction:
>>>
>>> www.qrpme.com/K7QO%20Manhattan%20Techniques%20Paper.pdf
>>>      
I experimented with a cheap leather punch and two sizes of round pad, to
make island pads for Manhattan:
1) Paxoline/SRPB 1.6mm board. Shatters
2) 1.6mm FR4. Awkward, but if the punch is sharpened around outer edge
with file, it just about works.
3) Some PCB for microwave patch antenna. < 0.8mm, material unknown.
Works great very easy.

It's the kind of very cheap punch with a wheel of about 8 different size
slightly conical hollow punch and lightweight "pliers" type action with
half open rolled sheet handles rather than solid.


2010\05\06@211135 by John Ferrell

face
flavicon
face
Altoids Cans as well. In the glass bottle era of homebrew, cake pans made
good chassis.
John Ferrell  W8CCW

When injustice becomes law,
 Resistance becomes DUTY.
    Thomas Jefferson
{Original Message removed}

2010\05\06@221433 by Tamas Rudnai

face picon face
What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it was
used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?

Thanks
Tamas


On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 2:11 AM, John Ferrell <spamBeGonejferrell13@spam@spamspam_OUTtriad.rr.com>wrote:

> Altoids Cans as well. In the glass bottle era of homebrew, cake pans made
> good chassis.
> John Ferrell  W8CCW
>
> When injustice becomes law,
>  Resistance becomes DUTY.
>     Thomas Jefferson
> {Original Message removed}

2010\05\07@043720 by Ariel Rocholl

flavicon
face
Perhaps for standard low frequency stuff you are right, but Manhattan and
other similar techniques are prototyping tools for RF design. You don't
really need it except for RF.

You cannot use breadboards and similar things for prototype RF multi-GHZ
circuitry. Once you have your Manhattan board working as expected, you go to
PCB production from there. In many cases you won't be able to use standard
PCB as they have a high loss dielectric so PCB production for teflon and
other materials are quite expensive and typically not available for
hobbyists.

2010/5/7 Tamas Rudnai <TakeThisOuTtamas.rudnaispamspamgmail.com>

> What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it was
> used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
>
> Thanks
> Tamas
>
>
>

2010\05\07@051720 by Ruben Jönsson

flavicon
face
Won't the extra length of component legs that this method brings with it,
especially for capacitors, introduce a lot of extra impedance in the circuits
at those frequencies?

/Ruben


{Quote hidden}

> -

2010\05\07@061907 by Ariel Rocholl

picon face
Examples on the document are just easy examples, you normally use much
shorter legs. I actually use a variation of this method with Kapton tape and
conductive strip which help you use 1206 SMD so parasistic impedance is
greatly reduced.

2010/5/7 Ruben Jönsson <RemoveMErubenEraseMEspamspam_OUTpp.sbbs.se>

{Quote hidden}

> > --

2010\05\07@080021 by Adam Field

flavicon
face
> What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it was
> used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
>

If you have a circuit in mind, you can build it in under an hour and
have a rigid prototype. I etch boards too, but the process takes much
longer than manhattan construction for low part count projects.

Using a punch to make islands is nice but i've used shears to cut
squares out for use with good results (thin PCB however).

2010\05\07@092327 by Olin Lathrop

face picon face
Adam Field wrote:
>> What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought
>> it was used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
>
> If you have a circuit in mind, you can build it in under an hour and
> have a rigid prototype. I etch boards too, but the process takes much
> longer than manhattan construction for low part count projects.

But these advantages are not unique to manhattan layout, only to fixed
pre-made prototyping boards you can solder to.

For example, the prototype area of my ReadyBoards
(http://www.embedinc.com/products) mimics the layout of common solderless
breadboards.  You can also use those just as well to build a circuit quickly
and end up with a rigid and reliable prototype.

2010\05\07@114251 by Dwayne Reid

flavicon
face
At 08:14 PM 5/6/2010, Tamas Rudnai wrote:
>What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it was
>used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?

Its quick and easy.  It has good RF performance (up to UHF
frequencies if you are careful).

I routinely use that technique when I'm adding circuitry to an
existing design.  For example, one of the mods I do to some of the
professional wireless intercom systems I work with (broadcast-type
comm systems) is to add a bias supply to the receive antenna input so
that a powered (active) receive antenna can be used.  The only place
that can be done on these particular units is inside the little metal
can that houses the input bandpass filter.  I use a few little
(3/16") diameter circles of PCB material glued to the top of the
existing circuit board to hold all of the components I need to
add.  The bypass capacitors have extremely short leads - the circles
are glued to areas of the existing PCB that are all
ground-plane.  Just scrape away the solder mask and solder the cap
from the added circle right down to the ground plane.

I've also been known to glue PCB circles right on top of SMT
components (usually chips).  Those are usually 1/8" diameter circles.

Modern purpose-built prototyping circuit boards have reduced the need
for Manhattan construction for most low-frequency work as well as
circuits that use mostly ICs.  But if I don't have the time or
inclination to design a PCB for a RF project, Manhattan construction
is probably my first choice.

FWIW - I sit down for fifteen minutes and punch several hundred
circles out of cleaned PCB material when I get low.  I use a Roper
Whitney "Junior" 3/16 punch - I purchased a couple of extra punches
(1/8", 3/16") and ground the centering-tits off so as to punch flat
circles.  Our local R-W supplier keeps most of the Roper-Whitney
stuff in stock and the extra punches were only a couple of dollars
each.  I store the cleaned circles in a small zip-lock baggie - they
don't oxidize too badly over a one year period.

dwayne

--
Dwayne Reid   <EraseMEdwaynerspam@spam@planet.eon.net>
Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd    Edmonton, AB, CANADA
(780) 489-3199 voice          (780) 487-6397 fax
http://www.trinity-electronics.com
Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing

2010\05\07@181121 by Tamas Rudnai

face picon face
Interesting stuff, thanks guys to lightening me up! There is something I
again I need to try :-)

Thanks
Tamas



On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Dwayne Reid <@spam@dwaynerspam_OUTspam.....planet.eon.net> wrote:

{Quote hidden}

> -

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2010 , 2011 only
- Today
- New search...