No exact or substring matches. trying for part
PICList
Thread
'[OT] ArtBots Take Manhattan (press release for li'
2003\06\06@201803
by
Philip Galanter
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact:
Douglas Irving Repetto
spam_OUTartbotsTakeThisOuT
artbots.org
June 3, 2003
ArtBots: The Robot Talent Show - ArtBots Take Manhattan
New York City, NY - Now in its second year, ArtBots: The Robot Talent
Show will take place on July 12th and 13th from noon to 6:00pm at
Eyebeam Gallery in Manhattan's Chelsea art district. Featuring the
work of 23 artists and groups from six countries, the show is a
hybrid combining aspects of both a juried art exhibition and a
traditional talent show. Participants include robots that draw,
paint, sculpt, sing, dance, and play musical instruments, as well as
many with talents that are a bit harder to pin down; you might call
them robotic sculpture or even cybernetic performance artists!
In keeping with the "Robot Talent Show" theme, attendees will be
invited to vote for their favorite ArtBot. Two awards will be
presented at the end of the show: The Audience Choice Award and The
Robot's Choice Award (the artists vote for their favorite ArtBots).
All ArtBots artists and curators will be present throughout the event.
In organizing the show ArtBots curators Douglas Repetto, Philip
Galanter, and Jenny Lee have drawn from a large and varied pool of
open call respondents and invitees. The resulting body of work
reflects the diversity of opinions, techniques, strategies, and goals
found in the world of robotic art. And while much of the work is
playful and lighthearted, robotic art gives its human fans plenty to
think about.
"The application of robotics to the arts raises interesting questions
about things like authorship, responsibility, intentionality, and
even consciousness," notes Repetto, "and those questions have
relevance that extends well beyond the arts. When an artist makes a
robot that makes a painting, who's the painter? Who's responsible?
Does it matter? If it's good, who (or what) takes the credit? What
about when a robot makes a mistake, or breaks down? Who takes the
fall? The technology being used by many artists today is no different
from the technology being used to build robotic companions for the
elderly, automated security systems, or self-guided missiles. As is
often the case, artists are at the forefront of these technological
and social developments, asking, if not always answering, important
questions about the world we're creating."
Philip Galanter notes, "As with last year's show we've tried to
create an event that appeals not only to academically inclined
connoisseurs of high technology art, but also families looking for a
fun, kid-friendly, afternoon out. With 23 works the exhibition
pitches a range of ideas, some of which may be contradictory. If
there is an overall trend, however, it is the digital shift of
emphasis from the virtual to the physical. A sufficiently complex
base of technologies for robotics will yield physical systems that
reach out to us in ways that exhibit the surprise, variety,
fecundity, and decay of the natural world. Eschewing technology art
as a virtual never-world requiring sense numbing LCD-goggles and
cyber-gloves to fool the body, these artists have chosen to explore
alternate realities, and alternate creatures, by creating them right
here in the physical world."
Jenny Lee remarks, "ArtBots is a showcase of human uses of
electronics, kinetics, sound, plants, and pixels to create art about
our complex relationship to technology and our changing concepts of
nature and self. Technology, by definition, is precise, quantifiable
and to a large extent, predictable. Technology in the hands of
artists often results in the unpredictable and quirky. The
intersection and overlap of human and machine are intriguing and
inspiring. The works in ArtBots are great examples of what is
possible when people think beyond the boundaries of standard,
technological applications and traditional approaches to art making.
Information on all ArtBots participants, including images, artist
statements, biographies, and links, is available now on the ArtBots
website: http://artbots.org
FACTS AT A GLANCE:
ArtBots: the Robot Talent Show
Cost: this is a FREE event
Date: Saturday and Sunday, July 12th and 13th, 2003
Time: Noon to 6:00 p.m.
Location:
Eyebeam Gallery
540 W 21st Street (between 10th and 11th Avenues)
New York, NY 10011
Nearest Subway: A/C/E/1/9 to 23rd Street
Additional information, including schedules, directions to the event,
and information about the participants is available at:
http://artbots.org
ArtBots Works and Participants:
50 drones: David Bowen (Minneapolis, MN)
Automated Architecture Robot: Ira Spool, Anna Tsypin (Brooklyn, MA)
BabyBott: Stefan Prosky (New York, NY)
chair de poule: Brad Todd (Quebec, Canada)
Drawing Machine 3.1415926: Fernando Orellana (Columbus, OH)
Drums of War: Rahul Bhargava, Mira Friedlander (McLean, VA)
Fotron2000(FOE-tron-too-THAU-zin(d)): Daniel Paluska, Jessica Banks
jackbackrack (Cambridge, MA)
freqout: David Webber, Keith Waters, Berwick Research Institute (Roxbury, MA)
Happy Feet: Stephen Turbek (Brooklyn, NY)
LEMUR: League of Electronic Musical Urban Robots (Brooklyn, NY)
Lev: Ranjit Bhatnagar (Brooklyn, NY)
MEART - "The semi living artist": SymbioticA Research Group in
collaboration with The Steve Potter Lab (Western Australia/Atlanta,
GA)
micro.adam & micro.eva: julius popp (Berlin, Germany)
Monkey On Your Back: Kal Spelletich/SEEMEN (San Francisco, CA)
Neil: Jason Van Anden (Brooklyn, NY)
Phrase: Leesa and Nicole Abahuni (Farmingdale, NY)
Robots like H2O: Photosythesis Perpetual Motion Machine:
Futurefarmers (San Francisco, CA)
Scratchrobot: Stijn Slabbinck (Ghent, Belguim)
Shootings (After Francisco de Goya): Han Gene Paik (Brooklyn, NY)
Slowscan Soundwave: Douglas Irving Repetto (New York, NY)
small work for robot and insects: host productions (Liverpool, UK)
Tribblation: Josh Lifton, Michael Broxton, Joseph Paradiso (Cambridge, MA)
The Watchers - Televisuality for Xenia: John S. Lathram lll (Columbus, OH)
ArtBots Staff:
ArtBots Director: Douglas Irving Repetto
ArtBots Curators/Producers: Douglas Irving Repetto, Philip Galanter, Jenny Lee
Eyebeam Producers: Andrea Harner and Jonah Peretti
Executive Producer: The Columbia University Computer Music Center
Website Design: The Mysterious Liz and D.I.R.
ArtBots Theme Song: Christopher Bailey
ArtBots Sponsors:
Producing Organization: The Columbia University Computer Music Center
(http://music.columbia.edu/cmc)
Hosting Organization: Eyebeam (http://eyebeam.org)
Other Sponsors: Pratt Institute (http://pratt.edu)
The NYU Arts Technology Group (http://www.nyu.edu/its/atg/)
DO NOT PUBLISH THE FOLLOWING
High quality photos of the participating ArtBots are available upon request.
Please contact via e-mail where possible.
Interview and Photo Contact:
Douglas Irving Repetto (ArtBots Director)
.....artbotsKILLspam
@spam@artbots.org
212-854-9267 (fax)
###
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
2003\06\06@204736
by
Tom Messenger
Question: what was the first artbot named?
Answer: PICasso
At 08:16 PM 6/6/03 -0400, you wrote:
>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>
>Contact:
>Douglas Irving Repetto
>artbots
KILLspamartbots.org
>
>
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
'[EE] Manhattan style construction'
2008\04\08@154057
by
James Newton
2008\04\08@162943
by
Byron Jeff
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 03:40:28PM -0400, James Newton wrote:
>
> I've added a little photo essay page to the site showing the very basics of
> "Manhattan" style construction:
>
> www.piclist.com/techref/pcb/manhattan.htm
>
> I would love to get some feedback, updates, further expansion, or ideas.
> Thanks to chuck adams, k7qo and Carel, na5n for permission to use their
> photographs.
On quick typo I saw. Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
Great page.
BAJ
2008\04\08@164455
by
David VanHorn
> On quick typo I saw. Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
I dunno.. I've had poi, that's "supper glue" :)
2008\04\08@164701
by
Bob Blick
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:29:38 +0000, "Byron Jeff" <EraseMEbyronjeffspam_OUT
TakeThisOuTclayton.edu>
said:
> On quick typo I saw. Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
>
Not if you make a meal out of it!
I really hate the way super glue smoke feels in the eyes - so I don't
use it on anything I will be soldering. Epoxy is bad enough. Especially
with the extra heat of lead-free, though that is still the distant
future for me when applied to prototyping.
Cheerful regards,
Bob
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
unladen european swallow
2008\04\08@164806
by
John Gardner
2008\04\08@170558
by
David VanHorn
2008\04\08@171550
by
John Gardner
2008\04\08@172915
by
Jinx
> On quick typo I saw. Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
No-on is above typos Byrone ;-)
> Great page.
Nice one
I can't help feeling that some techniques be reserved for something
really deserving, like 3D displays (and RF circuits seem to ring a
bell)
Google around for eg dead bug circuit
http://inklesspress.com/robot_art.htm
2008\04\08@175025
by
Andre Abelian
Very good idea to use gluing technique when need it but making whole
board I do not thing there is enough time for that. By the time we build it
it will be time to modify. Specially making pcb's are cheap now. Again
I like the gluing technique. Good job
Andre
{Original Message removed}
2008\04\08@180801
by
James Newton
2008\04\08@181615
by
Bob Blick
I thought it was Jim Williams from Linear Technology who dod all the
cool high speed prototyping with raw doublesided PC board.
Cheers,
Bob
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:07:36 -0700, "James Newton"
<EraseMEjamesnewton
massmind.org> said:
> I can't seem to find anything on Mr. Pease's site about it... Any idea
> what
> keywords or URL's to look for?
>
> --
> James.
>
> {Original Message removed}
2008\04\08@181657
by
Peter Todd
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 01:46:36PM -0700, Bob Blick wrote:
{Quote hidden}>
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:29:38 +0000, "Byron Jeff" <
RemoveMEbyronjeffEraseME
EraseMEclayton.edu>
> said:
>
> > On quick typo I saw. Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
> >
>
> Not if you make a meal out of it!
>
> I really hate the way super glue smoke feels in the eyes - so I don't
> use it on anything I will be soldering. Epoxy is bad enough. Especially
> with the extra heat of lead-free, though that is still the distant
> future for me when applied to prototyping.
Solder paste might work instead of super glue. Put a generous dab of
paste underneath and heat from the sides. The biggest problem would
likely be getting enough heat to the paste, but beats super glue fumes.
- --
peter[:-1]@petertodd.org http://petertodd.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH++2D3bMhDbI9xWQRApbFAJ9lMVuZyoU5YzQh/QaEHZRUf493ZwCdEeya
428SCi30eGRD3prV5WTnCys=
=br0s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2008\04\08@182142
by
John Gardner
IIRC there were a number of "What's All This <Whatever> Stuff"
articles which discussed down & dirty prototyping. They redid
the site & I have'nt been able to find them - Some were quite a
while back, 90-ish maybe.
Basically dead-bug style w/ copper ground plane - Unlovely
but worked well enough, apparently.
On 4/8/08, James Newton <RemoveMEjamesnewtonspam_OUT
KILLspammassmind.org> wrote:
> I can't seem to find anything on Mr. Pease's site about it... Any idea what
> keywords or URL's to look for?
>
> --
> James.
>
> {Original Message removed}
2008\04\08@182553
by
David VanHorn
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:07 PM, James Newton <RemoveMEjamesnewtonTakeThisOuT
spammassmind.org> wrote:
> I can't seem to find anything on Mr. Pease's site about it... Any idea what
> keywords or URL's to look for?
I didn't see anything there either, and it does seem to be an
aggressively undermaintained site.
2008\04\08@191551
by
Harold Hallikainen
Another spelling issue... I believe it should be "bus bars" instead of
"buss bars." See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buss .
On prototyping in general... I'm tending to go directly to prototype
circuit boards. They are pretty inexpensive (something like 3/$99 from
Advanced Circuits for 2 layer). I can then hack those up to fix my
mistakes. Most mistakes seem to be component values in analog circuits.
Hand wired prototypes seem to fall apart as I add one more wire to some
component. I spend more time debugging the wiring than the circuit. Also,
if this is something destined for production, at some point we're going to
need to do schematic capture and board layout anyway. May as well start
early.
My thoughts, anyway...
Harold
--
FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com - Advertising
opportunities available!
2008\04\08@192246
by
Jack Smith
2008\04\08@194555
by
John Gardner
|
> I thought it was Jim Williams from Linear Technology who dod all the
> cool high speed prototyping with raw doublesided PC board.
Yes, that's right! Very cool looking stuff. Maybe I can find that ...
thanks, Jack
On 4/8/08, Jack Smith <RemoveMEJack.SmithKILLspam
cox.net> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> I have a web page at www.cliftonlaboratories.com/Prototyping.htm
> with Manhattan-style construction, as well a few other techniques I've
> developed.
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> James Newton wrote:
> > I've added a little photo essay page to the site showing the very basics
> of
> > "Manhattan" style construction:
> >
> > www.piclist.com/techref/pcb/manhattan.htm
> >
> > I would love to get some feedback, updates, further expansion, or ideas.
> > Thanks to chuck adams, k7qo and Carel, na5n for permission to use their
> > photographs.
> >
> > James Newton: PICList webmaster/Admin
> >
jamesnewtonSTOPspam
spam_OUTpiclist.com 1-619-652-0593 phone
> >
http://www.piclist.com/member/JMN-EFP-786
> > PIC/PICList FAQ:
http://www.piclist.com
> >
> >
> >
> -
2008\04\08@211927
by
David VanHorn
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:45 PM, John Gardner <spamBeGonegoflo3STOPspam
EraseMEgmail.com> wrote:
> > I thought it was Jim Williams from Linear Technology who dod all the
> > cool high speed prototyping with raw doublesided PC board.
>
> Yes, that's right! Very cool looking stuff. Maybe I can find that ...
I'd like to see his equation for ripple current vs lifetime (plus a
lot of other parameters) in electrolytics again.
I used it for a very unusual SMPS design, but I haven't been able to
locate it for a while.
2008\04\08@223330
by
John Gardner
On 4/8/08, David VanHorn <KILLspammicrobrixspamBeGone
gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:45 PM, John Gardner <EraseMEgoflo3
EraseMEgmail.com> wrote:
> > > I thought it was Jim Williams from Linear Technology who dod all the
> > > cool high speed prototyping with raw doublesided PC board.
> >
> > Yes, that's right! Very cool looking stuff. Maybe I can find that ...
>
> I'd like to see his equation for ripple current vs lifetime (plus a
> lot of other parameters) in electrolytics again.
> I used it for a very unusual SMPS design, but I haven't been able to
> locate it for a while.
> -
2008\04\08@224335
by
Jinx
> > Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
> Not if you make a meal out of it!
It's what my mother calls 'gravy'........
2008\04\08@231244
by
John Gardner
Damn hippies...
On 4/8/08, Jinx <@spam@joecolquitt@spam@
spam_OUTclear.net.nz> wrote:
> > > Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
>
> > Not if you make a meal out of it!
>
> It's what my mother calls 'gravy'........
>
> -
2008\04\09@000512
by
Jinx
That's Mr Damn Hippy to you
> Damn hippies...
>
> On 4/8/08, Jinx <spamBeGonejoecolquitt
KILLspamclear.net.nz> wrote:
> > > > Super glue is spelled with only one 'p'.
> >
> > > Not if you make a meal out of it!
> >
> > It's what my mother calls 'gravy'........
2008\04\09@015308
by
KPL
"cheap" has different meanings in different parts of the world and for
different people. I haven't made/bought any real pcb in years now.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Andre Abelian
<.....aabelianspam_OUT
mason-electric.com> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> Very good idea to use gluing technique when need it but making whole
> board I do not thing there is enough time for that. By the time we build it
> it will be time to modify. Specially making pcb's are cheap now. Again
> I like the gluing technique. Good job
>
> Andre
>
>
>
>
>
> {Original Message removed}
2008\04\09@042537
by
Jeff Stevens
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 13:46 -0700, Bob Blick wrote:
> I really hate the way super glue smoke feels in the eyes - so I don't
> use it on anything I will be soldering. Epoxy is bad enough. Especially
> with the extra heat of lead-free, though that is still the distant
> future for me when applied to prototyping.
Interesting. I haven't noticed any superglue "smoke" building Manhattan
style. I even use Sn96/Ag3/Cu1 at 750 degrees F.
-Jeff
2008\04\09@045736
by
Apptech
>> I really hate the way super glue smoke feels in the
>> eyes -
May well be a cyanide compound.
> Interesting. I haven't noticed any superglue "smoke"
> building Manhattan
> style. I even use Sn96/Ag3/Cu1 at 750 degrees F.
Russell
2008\04\09@123402
by
John Ferrell
Hot melt glue (use shavings) works OK if you are fast...
John Ferrell W8CCW
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing." -- Edmund Burke
http://DixieNC.US
{Original Message removed}
'[EE] Manhattan-style Prototyping'
2010\05\06@114422
by
Marcel Birthelmer
2010\05\06@120106
by
Ariel Rocholl
2010\05\06@134746
by
Michael Watterson
2010\05\06@141559
by
Neil Cherry
On 05/06/2010 01:46 PM, Michael Watterson wrote:
> Ariel Rocholl wrote:
>> Chuck Adams wrote these nice articles, here is the introduction:
>>
>> www.qrpme.com/K7QO%20Manhattan%20Techniques%20Paper.pdf
>>
>> ...and your link is the 2nd part of it.
>>
>> 2010/5/6 Marcel Birthelmer <.....marcelb.lists
RemoveMEgmail.com>
>>
>>
> http://www.qrpme.com/
>
> This is a strange fixation, kits that fit in tuna tins or something?
>
> What next? Sardine cans with 320x240 touch screen 18F4550?
I want one but only if we can get the fish smell out of it. ;-)
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry RemoveMEncherry
spamBeGonelinuxha.com
http://www.linuxha.com/ Main site
http://linuxha.blogspot.com/ My HA Blog
Author of: Linux Smart Homes For Dummies
2010\05\06@174825
by
Michael Watterson
Neil Cherry wrote:
> On 05/06/2010 01:46 PM, Michael Watterson wrote:
>
>> Ariel Rocholl wrote:
>>
>>> Chuck Adams wrote these nice articles, here is the introduction:
>>>
>>> www.qrpme.com/K7QO%20Manhattan%20Techniques%20Paper.pdf
>>>
I experimented with a cheap leather punch and two sizes of round pad, to
make island pads for Manhattan:
1) Paxoline/SRPB 1.6mm board. Shatters
2) 1.6mm FR4. Awkward, but if the punch is sharpened around outer edge
with file, it just about works.
3) Some PCB for microwave patch antenna. < 0.8mm, material unknown.
Works great very easy.
It's the kind of very cheap punch with a wheel of about 8 different size
slightly conical hollow punch and lightweight "pliers" type action with
half open rolled sheet handles rather than solid.
2010\05\06@211135
by
John Ferrell
Altoids Cans as well. In the glass bottle era of homebrew, cake pans made
good chassis.
John Ferrell W8CCW
When injustice becomes law,
Resistance becomes DUTY.
Thomas Jefferson
{Original Message removed}
2010\05\06@221433
by
Tamas Rudnai
What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it was
used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
Thanks
Tamas
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 2:11 AM, John Ferrell <spamBeGonejferrell13@spam@
spam_OUTtriad.rr.com>wrote:
> Altoids Cans as well. In the glass bottle era of homebrew, cake pans made
> good chassis.
> John Ferrell W8CCW
>
> When injustice becomes law,
> Resistance becomes DUTY.
> Thomas Jefferson
> {Original Message removed}
2010\05\07@043720
by
Ariel Rocholl
Perhaps for standard low frequency stuff you are right, but Manhattan and
other similar techniques are prototyping tools for RF design. You don't
really need it except for RF.
You cannot use breadboards and similar things for prototype RF multi-GHZ
circuitry. Once you have your Manhattan board working as expected, you go to
PCB production from there. In many cases you won't be able to use standard
PCB as they have a high loss dielectric so PCB production for teflon and
other materials are quite expensive and typically not available for
hobbyists.
2010/5/7 Tamas Rudnai <TakeThisOuTtamas.rudnaispam
gmail.com>
> What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it was
> used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
>
> Thanks
> Tamas
>
>
>
2010\05\07@051720
by
Ruben Jönsson
|
Won't the extra length of component legs that this method brings with it,
especially for capacitors, introduce a lot of extra impedance in the circuits
at those frequencies?
/Ruben
{Quote hidden}> Perhaps for standard low frequency stuff you are right, but Manhattan and
> other similar techniques are prototyping tools for RF design. You don't
> really need it except for RF.
>
> You cannot use breadboards and similar things for prototype RF multi-GHZ
> circuitry. Once you have your Manhattan board working as expected, you go to
> PCB production from there. In many cases you won't be able to use standard
> PCB as they have a high loss dielectric so PCB production for teflon and
> other materials are quite expensive and typically not available for
> hobbyists.
>
> 2010/5/7 Tamas Rudnai <
tamas.rudnaiEraseME
gmail.com>
>
> > What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it
> was
> > used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Tamas
> >
> >
> >
> -
2010\05\07@061907
by
Ariel Rocholl
|
Examples on the document are just easy examples, you normally use much
shorter legs. I actually use a variation of this method with Kapton tape and
conductive strip which help you use 1206 SMD so parasistic impedance is
greatly reduced.
2010/5/7 Ruben Jönsson <RemoveMErubenEraseME
spam_OUTpp.sbbs.se>
{Quote hidden}> Won't the extra length of component legs that this method brings with it,
> especially for capacitors, introduce a lot of extra impedance in the
> circuits
> at those frequencies?
>
> /Ruben
>
>
> > Perhaps for standard low frequency stuff you are right, but Manhattan and
> > other similar techniques are prototyping tools for RF design. You don't
> > really need it except for RF.
> >
> > You cannot use breadboards and similar things for prototype RF multi-GHZ
> > circuitry. Once you have your Manhattan board working as expected, you go
> to
> > PCB production from there. In many cases you won't be able to use
> standard
> > PCB as they have a high loss dielectric so PCB production for teflon and
> > other materials are quite expensive and typically not available for
> > hobbyists.
> >
> > 2010/5/7 Tamas Rudnai <
@spam@tamas.rudnaiRemoveME
EraseMEgmail.com>
> >
> > > What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it
> > was
> > > used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Tamas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --
2010\05\07@080021
by
Adam Field
> What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it was
> used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
>
If you have a circuit in mind, you can build it in under an hour and
have a rigid prototype. I etch boards too, but the process takes much
longer than manhattan construction for low part count projects.
Using a punch to make islands is nice but i've used shears to cut
squares out for use with good results (thin PCB however).
2010\05\07@092327
by
Olin Lathrop
Adam Field wrote:
>> What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought
>> it was used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
>
> If you have a circuit in mind, you can build it in under an hour and
> have a rigid prototype. I etch boards too, but the process takes much
> longer than manhattan construction for low part count projects.
But these advantages are not unique to manhattan layout, only to fixed
pre-made prototyping boards you can solder to.
For example, the prototype area of my ReadyBoards
(http://www.embedinc.com/products) mimics the layout of common solderless
breadboards. You can also use those just as well to build a circuit quickly
and end up with a rigid and reliable prototype.
2010\05\07@114251
by
Dwayne Reid
|
At 08:14 PM 5/6/2010, Tamas Rudnai wrote:
>What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it was
>used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
Its quick and easy. It has good RF performance (up to UHF
frequencies if you are careful).
I routinely use that technique when I'm adding circuitry to an
existing design. For example, one of the mods I do to some of the
professional wireless intercom systems I work with (broadcast-type
comm systems) is to add a bias supply to the receive antenna input so
that a powered (active) receive antenna can be used. The only place
that can be done on these particular units is inside the little metal
can that houses the input bandpass filter. I use a few little
(3/16") diameter circles of PCB material glued to the top of the
existing circuit board to hold all of the components I need to
add. The bypass capacitors have extremely short leads - the circles
are glued to areas of the existing PCB that are all
ground-plane. Just scrape away the solder mask and solder the cap
from the added circle right down to the ground plane.
I've also been known to glue PCB circles right on top of SMT
components (usually chips). Those are usually 1/8" diameter circles.
Modern purpose-built prototyping circuit boards have reduced the need
for Manhattan construction for most low-frequency work as well as
circuits that use mostly ICs. But if I don't have the time or
inclination to design a PCB for a RF project, Manhattan construction
is probably my first choice.
FWIW - I sit down for fifteen minutes and punch several hundred
circles out of cleaned PCB material when I get low. I use a Roper
Whitney "Junior" 3/16 punch - I purchased a couple of extra punches
(1/8", 3/16") and ground the centering-tits off so as to punch flat
circles. Our local R-W supplier keeps most of the Roper-Whitney
stuff in stock and the extra punches were only a couple of dollars
each. I store the cleaned circles in a small zip-lock baggie - they
don't oxidize too badly over a one year period.
dwayne
--
Dwayne Reid <EraseMEdwayner
@spam@planet.eon.net>
Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA
(780) 489-3199 voice (780) 487-6397 fax
http://www.trinity-electronics.com
Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing
2010\05\07@181121
by
Tamas Rudnai
Interesting stuff, thanks guys to lightening me up! There is something I
again I need to try :-)
Thanks
Tamas
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Dwayne Reid <@spam@dwaynerspam_OUT
.....planet.eon.net> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> At 08:14 PM 5/6/2010, Tamas Rudnai wrote:
> >What is the advantage of using Manhattan technique? I always thought it
> was
> >used only before PCB etching become available to hobbyists?
>
> Its quick and easy. It has good RF performance (up to UHF
> frequencies if you are careful).
>
> I routinely use that technique when I'm adding circuitry to an
> existing design. For example, one of the mods I do to some of the
> professional wireless intercom systems I work with (broadcast-type
> comm systems) is to add a bias supply to the receive antenna input so
> that a powered (active) receive antenna can be used. The only place
> that can be done on these particular units is inside the little metal
> can that houses the input bandpass filter. I use a few little
> (3/16") diameter circles of PCB material glued to the top of the
> existing circuit board to hold all of the components I need to
> add. The bypass capacitors have extremely short leads - the circles
> are glued to areas of the existing PCB that are all
> ground-plane. Just scrape away the solder mask and solder the cap
> from the added circle right down to the ground plane.
>
> I've also been known to glue PCB circles right on top of SMT
> components (usually chips). Those are usually 1/8" diameter circles.
>
> Modern purpose-built prototyping circuit boards have reduced the need
> for Manhattan construction for most low-frequency work as well as
> circuits that use mostly ICs. But if I don't have the time or
> inclination to design a PCB for a RF project, Manhattan construction
> is probably my first choice.
>
> FWIW - I sit down for fifteen minutes and punch several hundred
> circles out of cleaned PCB material when I get low. I use a Roper
> Whitney "Junior" 3/16 punch - I purchased a couple of extra punches
> (1/8", 3/16") and ground the centering-tits off so as to punch flat
> circles. Our local R-W supplier keeps most of the Roper-Whitney
> stuff in stock and the extra punches were only a couple of dollars
> each. I store the cleaned circles in a small zip-lock baggie - they
> don't oxidize too badly over a one year period.
>
> dwayne
>
> --
> Dwayne Reid <
spamBeGonedwaynerEraseME
planet.eon.net>
> Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA
> (780) 489-3199 voice (780) 487-6397 fax
>
http://www.trinity-electronics.com
> Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing
>
> -
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2010
, 2011 only
- Today
- New search...