Truncated match.
PICList
Thread
'PIC based frequency measurement for musical tunes'
2000\06\12@111138
by
Albert Goodwill
Is there any PIC based project on the net to measure (main) frequency of a
musical instrument's sound to determine which note it play?
Any suggestion how to do a fast-responce musical tuner ?
spam_OUTalbertgoodwillTakeThisOuT
geocities.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
2000\06\12@111806
by
Alan B. Pearce
probably the best way is to excite the strings, using the strings as part of the feedback
loop so they are determining the frequency. Then use some form of frequency counter,
probably by measuring the period of oscillation.
There was an item on a science program in the UK recently where someone is developing a
box to do this, but it went the whole hog and had motors to drive the tuning pegs on a
guitar so it would auto tune it for you.
2000\06\12@133525
by
Robert Rolf
Albert Goodwill wrote:
> Is there any PIC based project on the net to measure (main) frequency of
> a musical instrument's sound to determine which note it play?
>
> Any suggestion how to do a fast-responce musical tuner ?
Strobe wheel tuners are 'fast' (instantaneous).
Basically a 6" disk spinning at a fixed rate (synchronous motor) and a
neon bulb driven by the audio.
They worked well because the harmonics of a tone didn't need to be
filtered out. You can still find them in some music store's junk rooms.
If you really want to do it electronically I would suggest using
a zero crossing approach and 'pic' the longest period you find
as your fundamental. A voltage controlled bandpass filter might
be a nice addition to get you higher accuracy. If you want overkill,
how about a FFT with adjustable sample rate so you can optimize the
resolution?
2000\06\12@142101
by
pandersn
Did you call it the tune-o-matic?
Phil.
On Monday, June 12, 2000 10:17 AM, Alan B. Pearce [SMTP:.....A.B.PearceKILLspam
@spam@RL.AC.UK] wrote:
> probably the best way is to excite the strings, using the strings as part of the feedback
> loop so they are determining the frequency. Then use some form of frequency counter,
> probably by measuring the period of oscillation.
>
> There was an item on a science program in the UK recently where someone is developing a
> box to do this, but it went the whole hog and had motors to drive the tuning pegs on a
> guitar so it would auto tune it for you.
2000\06\12@142930
by
pandersn
|
Albert....
Your approach could depend upon the duration of each note you seek to tone
measure. Do you wish to give a steady tone for 40 to 100 ms for example? A
DPLL, digital phase lock loop, with a narrow feedback filter would give you
accuracy if you wish to make the measurement with some noise present.
Measuring/counting clocks between edges on a ZCD is subject to jittle, but
averaging there too might help.
Phil Anderson.
Sounds like a fun project.
On Monday, June 12, 2000 12:34 PM, Robert Rolf
[SMTP:Robert.Rolf
KILLspamUALBERTA.CA] wrote:
> Albert Goodwill wrote:
> > Is there any PIC based project on the net to measure (main) frequency
of
{Quote hidden}> > a musical instrument's sound to determine which note it play?
> >
> > Any suggestion how to do a fast-responce musical tuner ?
>
> Strobe wheel tuners are 'fast' (instantaneous).
> Basically a 6" disk spinning at a fixed rate (synchronous motor) and a
> neon bulb driven by the audio.
> They worked well because the harmonics of a tone didn't need to be
> filtered out. You can still find them in some music store's junk rooms.
>
> If you really want to do it electronically I would suggest using
> a zero crossing approach and 'pic' the longest period you find
> as your fundamental. A voltage controlled bandpass filter might
> be a nice addition to get you higher accuracy. If you want overkill,
> how about a FFT with adjustable sample rate so you can optimize the
> resolution?
2000\06\13@122303
by
Alan B. Pearce
>Did you call it the tune-o-matic?
I did not call it anything, it was just an item I observed on the show. I cannot
recall what name it had.
2000\06\13@212258
by
Jinx
> >Did you call it the tune-o-matic?
>
> I did not call it anything, it was just an item I observed on the show. I
cannot
> recall what name it had.
I just know I've got an item about this tucked away on a video tape
somewhere. "Things I'd like to have a go at" (ha !!). Which I can't find
right now.
However, the guitar in question was an item on Australian science
program "Beyond 2000". So, a quick trip to http://www.beyond2000.com then
a search for "guitar" brought up the item I remembered. The company is
Transperformance, their web site site is (surprise surpise)
http://www.transperformance.com I didn't linger long so don't know if they have
pics of the beastie. If they don't I can tell you that the cavity behind the
pickups is one mess of PCBs and screw motors. Very effective it was
too. And quick
2000\06\14@054107
by
Alan B. Pearce
>However, the guitar in question was an item on Australian science
>program "Beyond 2000". So, a quick trip to http://www.beyond2000.com then
the UK program is "Tomorrows World". I remember seeing Beyond 2000 in NZ, and am
aware that the various producers seem to share items.
2000\06\16@055928
by
Alan B. Pearce
>However, the guitar in question was an item on Australian science
>program "Beyond 2000". So, a quick trip to http://www.beyond2000.com then
the UK program is "Tomorrows World". I remember seeing Beyond 2000 in NZ, and am
aware that the various producers seem to share items.
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2000
, 2001 only
- Today
- New search...