Terry says:
...the non-turbo mode does NOT divide the clock speed. At the slower clock rates it really doesn't save much current at all.Here is the test program:
DEVICE SX28,STACKX,OPTIONX,OSC128KHZ FREQ 128_000 PROGRAM Start NOSTARTUP Start: TRIS_A=0 TRIS_B=0 TRIS_C=0 Main: TOGGLE RB.5 PAUSE 5000 GOTO StartHere is what I measured {ed: this was at 5V supply, consumption would have been much less at 3.3 or 2.5 volts. See: SX Power Issues}
32KHz Turbo = 1.32mA 32KHz Non-Turbo = 1.30mA 128KHz Turbo = 1.46mA 128KHz Non-Turbo = 1.40mA 1MHz Turbo = 3.1mA 1MHz Non-Turbo = 2.4mA 4MHz Turbo = 7.7mA 4MHz Non-Turbo = 5.2mAConsidering that 1MHz Turbo (3.1mA) has the same performance as 4MHz Non-Turbo (5.2mA). It is better to use the turbo mode if you are looking at MIP per mA.
Perl62 says:
Non-turbo mode simply adds a few cycles delay to emualte the instruction timing of a PIC. It's purpose was simply to allow PIC firmware to be directly loaded to the SX and still be able to run.
file: /Techref/scenix/turbopower.htm, 1KB, , updated: 2005/1/21 11:31, local time: 2024/12/24 17:42,
18.227.134.165:LOG IN
|
©2024 These pages are served without commercial sponsorship. (No popup ads, etc...).Bandwidth abuse increases hosting cost forcing sponsorship or shutdown. This server aggressively defends against automated copying for any reason including offline viewing, duplication, etc... Please respect this requirement and DO NOT RIP THIS SITE. Questions? <A HREF="http://massmind.org/techref/scenix/turbopower.htm"> SX Power Consumption in Turbo vs Non-Turbo modes</A> |
Did you find what you needed? |
Welcome to massmind.org! |
Welcome to massmind.org! |
.